Thursday 29 March 2012

Transcript of "All those dangerous woman-haters!"




I've mentioned more than once how I've come across people who are able to get behind some--even many--of the causes championed by the men's rights movement, but who are essentially put off or even scared away by the anger, misogyny, aggression and generalizations of women (or even feminists) commonly found in MRM spaces. I think it's probably every other week that someone posts in r/mensrights on reddit that if only the gang would tone down the language, not be so accusatory toward feminism, and stop generalizing women, that they'd be more comfortable there, because...oh, because feminism did accomplish some good things, or because not all women are like that and it's unfair to generalize, or because anger and hostility will scare support away from the causes. (One thing I think these people don't realize is that men's advocates tried that for almost 30 years in the field of domestic violence advocacy, and I think we can all guess how well the whole "asking politely and calmly" thing worked for them.)

This squeamishness of would-be supporters when they're confronted with the levels of frustration in the MRM is kind of ridiculous, all things considered. When people's rights are trampled, you can expect them to get mad and to express that. And when I look at even mainstream articles, no one seems to be shy about generalizing men or masculinity, or criticizing large subgroups of men for either embodying masculinity or failing to embody it "properly". Hell, Obama's father's day address admonished black fathers--a demographic that faces some serious social and economic challenges--for failing to man-up to their paternal responsibilities. (Of course, there was no Mother's Day admonition toward black mothers to, say, woman up and not have babies until they're in stable relationships, or to facilitate their children's access to their fathers, when both behaviors heavily contribute to the problem of fatherlessness in the black community in the US. And why wouldn't he? Because that would be generalizing and unfairly critical, right?)

Anyway, a week or two ago, I stumbled across a video wherein a prominent and popular online feminist vlogger, Jessica Valenti gave a monologue on misogyny, and her estimation of the MRA community online, trying to portray it as some festering, oozing, pathogenic ulcer of misogynistic sentiment and hateful anti-feminism (who don't really do anything for men, no less). And from the histrionics and accusations of a recent commenter on my channel as to the misogynistic nature of my entire audience, I'm pretty sure Ms. Valenti isn't alone.

Okay, I can't say I was shocked watching Ms. Valenti speak on this topic, or even disappointed. I think it's fair to say I rolled my eyes so hard at her desperation to connect the MRM in any possible way, no matter how absurd, with misogynistic violence and hate, I may have actually sprained my eyeballs.

I can't be sure whether Ms. Valenti feels so threatened by any expression of maleness that does not comply with the drawing room decorum demanded by feminists, that she hied herself to her fainting couch before learning one damn thing about us, or whether she knows what we're about and is deliberately smearing the movement with the flimsiest of accusations, hoping that if she paints us all in a poor enough light no one will bother to go look and see if she knows what the hell she's talking about.

Neither possibility reflects well on her, or on others who agree with her.

First bit of ignorance, she conflates anti-feminism with misogyny, and immediately after, she conflates the men's rights movement with the game community (otherwise known as pick-up artists, or PUA).

A little background on the MRA/PUA thing for those of you who might be new here. Both "movements" are based at least in part on an acceptance of the empirically supported biological reality of gender differences in behavior and psychology. Both movements recognize the system we currently have in place, largely due to rampant and unchecked feminist advocacy acting in concert with traditional white-knighting, is...well, fucked. Annnnnd that's pretty much where they part ways.

MRAs want to fix the system, or create a new one based on real equality. PUAs either think the system is beyond repair, or don't care to fix it. After all, if they fixed it, they wouldn't be able to exploit and capitalize on all the openings provided by its fucked-upness in their endless quest for low-cost fun and poon.

MRAs often characterize PUAs as pussy-worshippers, while PUAs disdain MRAs as pointless and counter-productive beta-grovellers who could be milking the broken system for all it's worth if they'd just get the right attitude, some decent clothes and weren't so busy whining. There is a fair amount of cross-over as far as each being interested in some of the writings and activities on either side, but to conflate the two and lump them into one big bag of male discontent is as foolish as claiming fundamentalist islam is the same as Buddhism, because both are based on spirituality.

So to recap: PUAs are happy with the status quo, and even if they see a collapse coming, they're happy to fuck and drink and carouse all they can while it all falls apart. MRAs are trying to prevent said collapse.

Now these distinctions are important, because of the fact that unless someone like Valenti can connect the MRA and the PUA communities into some kind of organism with a common purpose, you can't say things like this: "George Sodini, the man who shot those women at a gym in Pennsylvania not too long ago this past year, was kind of peripherally involved with some of them online," in the context of a discussion of the MRM.

Because I looked for quite a while and the only connection I could find between Sodini and the men's community online is the fact that he attended a seminar on how to be more successful with women--I'm assuming he was there to learn Game. And you can be sure, if someone like Valenti had something more concrete, she wouldn't have been circumspect enough to say, "peripherally involved"--she'd have named names and told the camera exactly where and with whom online this guy was hanging out. So there it is. A single seminar on how to learn Game Theory.

So here's a guy who's arguably been slowly going crazy for a long time, who hasn't been laid in 20 years, who happens to attend a single PUA seminar in the months before he finally flips his nut and shoots a bunch of women, and this is indicative--according to Valenti--of the misogyny in the Men's Rights Movement, and that's how she can rationalize her way into saying: "So I do think that kind of paying attention to the misogyny and the anti-feminism that's happening online and the way that these men are bolstering each other and supporting each other in really violent views about women, it's something important that we need to pay attention to. Blah blah, hateful toward women, danger, blah blah blah, violent misogyny, violent views, blah blah, hate women, blah blah, no accountability online, blah blah, want to kill women, blah blah, place where people are like 'yeah me too'." And she can say all of that and frame it within the context of a discussion of the men's rights movement.

Because George Sodini attended a PUA seminar sometime before he went off his rocker, he is now ONE OF US.

Now, there was a lot of discussion in men's communities online about Sodini, and the very worst of it was pretty bad, but largely if not entirely confined to the comment sections of various blog posts, most of which occurred in the PUA community--a community of social nihilists, mind you, who look down their noses at the MRM for trying to fix the system that provides them with all that cut rate pussy. A few of those commenters praised him overtly or in a roundabout way, but most of the comments were of the "canary in the coal mine" sort--the kind you might see when a woman does something awful and people believe they know why, and then discuss the systemic problems that might lead to more people doing more horrible things of that nature for the same systemic reasons.

In other words, most of the discussion revolved around how the system marginalizes men, and how we can fix the system so that we DON'T end up with more George Sodinis.

Right or wrong, Sodini felt that our feminist society had cheated him out of any kind of normal or decent life. A lot of people in the MRM feel the same way to one degree or another. So I'm going to repeat this: most of the examination of Sodini in the men's rights community was about how society can change so that we don't get more Sodinis.

But it seems that the very fact that men were discussing it in the larger context of systemic discrimination against men rather than simply condemning Sodini as a monster and then shutting up about it...this is a clear sign to feminists like Valenti and other hand-wringers and pearl-clutchers that MRAs hate women and have violent views about women. Despite the fact that on most MRA blogs, any kind of incitement to violent action, either against isolated women or against the system, is swiftly and sternly rebuffed, and even though MRAs want to fix the system that creates men like Sodini, it must have been MRAs who brainwashed Sodini into hating women enough to kill a bunch of them.

Oh, noble Jessica, and noble noble feminism, a movement that is benign and peaceful and has everyone's best interests at heart.

So I was just thinking we should examine another famous shooter, one who went by the name of Valerie Solanas.

For those of you who don't know, Solanas is the feminist author of the infamous SCUM manifesto, whom many feminists today have tried to characterize as a satirical work (yet more revisionist history right there, but I'll get to that in a minute). Another feminist told me just the other day that it was, at its heart, wholly nihilistic, calling for the end of humanity altogether--which I found interesting, since the manifesto actually calls for the systemic extermination of the male sex through violent rebellion on the part of women, after which said women could live the rest of their lives in peace, at which point why would any of them want to burden themselves with children. To conclude that the main point of the manifesto was some sort of egalitarian vision of nihilism wrt humanity as a whole is basically equating the genocidal killing of males with the free choice on the part of women to not spoil their male-free Utopian existence by having children.

In other words, the brutal murder of a man is exactly the same as a woman choosing not to have a baby, in the mind of at least one feminist I've spoken to.

Solanas' other claim to fame was as the person who shot and nearly killed Andy Warhol. She actually attempted to kill three men that day, shot Warhol and art maven Mario Amaya, an associate of Warhol's, and put the gun against the head of Warhol's manager, Fred Hughes, at which point the gun jammed. If the gun hadn't jammed, there's no reason to believe three men wouldn't have ended up dead.

Not as well known to most is the fact that Warhol wasn't even the man Solanas had set out to kill that day. Her intended target was her publisher, Maurice Girodias, whom she felt had wronged her. As a condition of him publishing the SCUM manifesto through Olympia Press, which he owned, he'd required her to give him the right of first refusal to all her future work. This is a common clause in publishing contracts, and simply stipulates that the author will bring all future, or all related, work to that publisher first, at which point the publisher can offer for it or decline, and the author can accept the offer, negotiate better terms, or decline altogether and offer it elsewhere. Ms. Solanas took this agreement to mean that Girodias now owned the copyright to all her future works. So clearly if the redundant and meandering, incoherent drivel of the manifesto itself was not indicative enough of the woman's extreme level of crazy and stupid, the fact that she never bothered to ask anyone what that agreement meant--either before complying with it or after, or indeed before setting out to kill because of it--should be evidence enough of some serious deficiencies.

When Solanas went looking for Girodias, he wasn't at his office. For whatever reason, she decided Warhol would be a suitable stand-in to vent her spleen at men, and claimed to police and at her hearing that Warhol--who had done nothing more than give her a couple of bit parts in two of his movies--had "too much control in her life", had her, "tied up lock stock and barrel" and was "going to do something" to her that would have "ruined" her. At her hearing she insisted she was right in what she did and had nothing to regret. After some very well-needed stints in Bellevue Hospital for psychiatric evaluation, she pled guilty to reckless assault with attempt to harm, and was sentenced to three years. She was reported at that time to be dedicating "the remainder of her life to the avowed purpose of eliminating every single male from the face of the earth," and though aware of the feminist movement of the time, she considered them a "civil disobedience luncheon club."

In essence, even the most radical second wavers were not radical enough for Solanas. They might hate men, they might want to liberate themselves completely from men, but they weren't prepared to eliminate all males from the face of the earth--at least not yet--so Solanas had no time or patience for them. They were merely "playing" at being feminists, apparently.

But as much as Solanas couldn't be bothered to associate herself with the radical-but-not-radical-enough feminists of the day, those feminists practically jumped at the chance to associate themselves with her, once she flipped her nut and pulled a Sodini.

Robin Morgan, a prolific feminist author who eventually became editor of Ms Magazine (arguably the most influential feminist rag there is) joined demonstrators demanding Solanas' release from prison. Ti-Grace Atkinson, feminist author and then president of the NY chapter of NOW, praised Solanas as "the first outstanding champion of women's rights." Florynce Kennedy, a lawyer and active member of NOW, who went on to found the feminist party and the women's political caucus, called her "one of the most important spokeswomen of the feminist movement."

Wow. So if a few comments on PUA blogs sympathetic to George Sodini is a sign that the Men's Rights community online is filled with misogyny, what does the fact that prominent feminist writers and thinkers beatified Valerie Solanas say about misandry within feminism?

And it's not like I have to go very far back in history to find feminists glorifying violence against men and pedestalizing the women who commit it.

Lorena Bobbitt, whose initial statement to police--according to the NY Times--was "He always have orgasm and he doesn't wait for me to have orgasm. He's selfish. I don't think it's fair, so I pulled back the sheets and then I did it,"--was hailed as a national folk hero, an obviously terrorized battered woman striking back at her oppressor. Never mind that there was plenty of evidence of reciprocal violence in that relationship. Never mind that he was in the process of leaving her, and they'd been discussing divorce.

The feminist narrative reared its ugly head, and the case was crammed into that model, complete with a rape accusation that could not be proven in a court of law, and a story that repeatedly changed gears, from her initial statement onward, to fit the dogma of domineering, abusive husband and terrified, cowed wife. Before she had even she cried abuse, the feminists of North America picked her up on their shoulders, a display of sisterly solidarity with a violent offender that culminated in carnival-style demonstrations outside the courtroom, including the dispensing of cocktail wieners slathered in ketchup, t-shirts extolling the sweet virtues of revenge, and feminists selling buttons nominating Bobbitt for surgeon general.

Mainstream magazines hailed her as a feminist heroine, and perhaps most disturbing, a major feminist group in Ecuador, Bobbitt's home country, not only bankrolled her defence, but threatened to castrate 100 innocent American men if she went to prison for mutilating her husband.

Nope. No misandry evident in any of that. Or violent sentiment. Or terrorist leanings. At ALL.

I mean, feminists must be super-aware of terrorism, since I've been warned by well-meaning feminists that supporting men who go their own way is an act of terrorism because MRAs sometimes use harsh or colorful language, so I'm sure the vast majority of prominent feminists loudly and firmly condemned that group in Ecuador for the terrorists they are, and admonishing the movement as a whole for associating with such groups....oh wait. Never mind.

Anyway, even as recently as a couple months ago, the very same danger Ms. Valenti claims runs rampant within the men's communities online--the danger that "because there's no accountability online the same way there is in real life, all of a sudden you can say like, "yeah, I hate women, I wanna kill women," you can say that online and not only will you find a place to say it, but you'll find a place to say it where people are like, "yeah, me too.""

Which brings me to a little corner of the online, feminist universe called RadicalHub, and some lovely quotes found there:

A feminist child care worker, speaking about the boys in her care: "I honestly have been reassessing the fact that I am giving care to these little future rapists....I know it is kinda going against my principles to support and care for these little fuckers."

A feminist web developer: I'm one of those bad, shameful feminists who wish we could all just kill the fuckers (whether it's a practical tack to take or not).

A feminist and fellow Canuck: "Females don't have to kill baby boys. Just not nurture them. Females are forced to birth baby boys, but beyond that a female's physical actions are her own. Males will die without the constant infusion of female energy that they get from our wombs and from our lives.... Females need to not be emotionally and intellectually invested in a male future."

A UK feminist lobbyist: It needs to be so unfashionable to have boys, and then they would be aborted before seeing the light of day...violent revolution is the only answer...

And a feminist and bestselling novelist: ...your proposal to exterminated the male entirely a la Solanas is to me more of a last resort.... I assume you object that lowering testosterone levels would not necessarily end the oppression. You may be right.

These aren't random, unemployed internet kooks who live on chee-tos and haven't seen the sun in years, either. They're lobbyists, community development coordinators, they work for Arts Councils and Chambers of Commerce, teach special ed and care for children, lawyers and bestselling authors. These are not basement dwelling losers, they're respectable people with jobs that involve public trust. Other contributors to Radicalhub include noted feminists, Julie Bindle and Sheila Jeffreys.

I'm starting to wonder just how atrocious a feminist would have to behave in order for others in the movement to accept the kind of guilt by association that they're so quick to apply to the MRA and men like George Sodini, whose association with the MRM consisted of attending a seminar on how to pick up women.

I don't understand how Paul Elam saying, "Men going their own way IS fucking feminists' shit up" qualifies as terrorism in the MRM, while a publicized threat called into several media outlets to sever the penises of 100 random American men if a violent woman spent a night in prison wasn't enough to so much as dampen the carnival atmosphere and feminist glee outside the courthouse at Lorena Bobbitt's trial. I really don't understand how feminists can now rewrite history and claim the SCUM manifesto was a work of satire, when not only did its author take it to its logical conclusion on a small scale, but other feminists of the day who have since risen to prominence lauded her violent and murderous actions as those of a feminist champion.

Seriously. What the fuck is going on? You put a monster in some strappy sandals and lipstick and suddenly it's not a monster anymore but a hero, or harmless? I just don't get it.

And at the same time, the moment a man gets angry or speaks passionately, everyone's ducking and covering because some lunatic who shot a bunch of women made some of the same criticisms of the system that influences all our lives, and attended a single seminar on how to pick up women?





21 comments:

  1. Thanks for the interesting read.

    I'm a fan of Andy Warhol, but even if I wasn't, I would consider Valerie Solonas a thoroughly despicable human being. The fact that some feminists have kind words for her, or even consider her a hero, is simply incomprehensible to me. She should be the poster child of everything a feminist shouldn't be.

    That said, she is entertaining to read about, but only for her craziness.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi GWW! Just to let you know I've passed and got the transcripts. You'll hear from me soon.

    (I see I appear as "Direitos dos Homens" blogger, but I'm not blogging, just trying to deal with google accounts, lol)

    Hugs, take care!
    Aldir.

    ReplyDelete
  3. This article would be great if misandry actually existed.

    Sadly, it does not.

    Please, let me help you...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Says the voice of privilege.

      And what kind of a moral cripple thinks it's "sad" that misandry doesn't exist, if it didn't?

      Delete
    2. I've been reading your entire blog in (mostly) chronological order and so only just got to this. And now I'm further regretting the "say nice things about feminists" challenge, but I think more than ever your that a "why I won't call myself a feminist" essay would be terrific.

      I think part of this really is generational. Jessica Valenti, born in 1978, would have to get through a generation of whitewashing to get to the truth. And Solanas isn't the only whitewashed terrorist from the 1960s. Something very similar happened to Bernadine Dohrn. Although she wasn't a feminist activist per se, she's a woman who got away with a shocking amount with a comparative slap on the wrist. But then the same happened with her husband (who, in an unusual irony, got off easier than she did). So let's be clear on this one: whitewashing someone's terrorist past doesn't -just- happen to feminists.

      And the bigger point is: so many young women are so blissfully unaware of any of this, they've been taught for so long that "feminism is about equality," well, if we're going to get through to some of them we're going to have to work on it.

      I firmly believe that without more feminine voices saying "these are our sons, our brothers, in many cases some of our best friends, we have to stop this," it won't stop, because too many other social factors mitigate against men doing it all by themselves. We have to get through to women.

      I often think of my old friend Trudy Schuett, who is probably 15-20 years older than either of us and is now pretty close to retired from the men's rights movement, though she's been active in it from the 1970s (when it was even less popular than now). She used to say, "Never argue with a drunk or a feminist," and while that made me laugh it also made me cringe, because I thought, "ohhhh, there's so many people who don't know the depths of all this who just stopped listening."

      I try to remind myself of this one constantly, especially in the online universe: people who comment online are by far the minority of readers. By at least a 10:1 margin. And for every uber-feminist apologist who just will not speak sense you argue with, there will be AT LEAST ten (maybe a hundred) silent observers who never say a word but are trying to decide which of you is more full of shit.

      Rudolph Giuliani, the former Mayor of New York, once told a story about the very first time he ran for political office (i.e. LONG before he was ever elected Mayor of anything), and how he had a mentor who was a successful politician. They were at some political parade, and Giuliani got buttonholed by a bystander and they began debating some issue. Guiliani was going toe-to-toe with the guy, at length, until suddenly his mentor grabbed him by the shoulder and said, "Kid, you ain't gettin' his vote. Let's go."

      The goal of a politician is not to win an argument. It's to GET ELECTED. Similarly, when as advocates for a position we get lost in the fog of "I have to convince this person that they're WRONG," we forget that this isn't private correspondence, this is writing (or vlogging) FOR AN AUDIENCE, most of whom are quietly drawing their own conclusions.

      I also try to repeat this one to myself: "Preaching to the choir feels good. It's also reaching for low-hanging fruit."

      If we don't reach more women, especially young ones, and get this through to them--that men they actually love are at risk--this whole enterprise is doomed. Yes, there will -always- be women (or men) who for whatever reason won't or can't be convinced. OK. But then there's the ones who can be convinced.

      If that made any sense.

      Delete
    3. "And for every uber-feminist apologist who just will not speak sense you argue with, there will be AT LEAST ten (maybe a hundred) silent observers who never say a word but are trying to decide which of you is more full of shit."
      I'd like to attest to this. It was seeing Paul Elam and Warren Farrell be so graceful and reasonable in the face of the ugliest, most hateful behaviour that made me actually give the MRA-type people the time of day.
      Crowing online about tearing down opponents' posters or pulling a fire alarm on their assembly betrays the moral high-ground they claim, and drives impartial third parties like me to want to hear what the opposition is saying to warrant all this dogmatic fervor.
      (Hell, not even impartial; as I alluded to above, I was on THEIR side. If you'd have asked two or three years ago i'd have said I was a feminist. I'm just-- like most people I hope/believe-- a reasonable person who cares about truth and justice).

      Delete
    4. Testimony On How My Life was Transform through the help of a God-sent Lender..

      Hello everyone, I am Kathie Roper by name, am writing this Testimony because am really grateful for what Mason Diego did for me and my family, when I thought there was no hope he came and make my family feel alive again by lending us loan at a very low interest rate of 2%. Well I have been searching for a loan to settle my debts for the past three months all I met scammed and took my money until I finally met a God sent Lender. I never thought that there are still genuine loan lenders on the internet but to my greatest surprise i got my loan without wasting much time so if you are out there looking for a loan of any amount i would advise you to email Mr Diego via email: { diegoloancompany@yahoo.com } and be free of internet scams. thanks... Kathie Roper from California, USA.

      Delete
  4. as frightening as this essay is, there is nothing unusual. celebration of and calls for violence against men is a regular occurrence. most women i know hit men, and feel it is their right. I've never had a girlfriend who didn't hit me whereas i would be in jail if i had ever struck one back.

    i was once warned never to argue with your girlfriend in private and to back away and leave if she becomes too angry or sooner or later you will be in a jail cell if only because you raised your arms to ward off blows.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. > I've never had a girlfriend who didn't hit me

      Wow. You have to look for better partners. Take care of yourself, man.

      Delete
  5. Only beating up of you that I'd do if I was in a room with you might be hurting your arm due to a vehement handshake. Bravo on all your points and it gives me hope to hear more and more people awakening to your words.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Wow, finally. Reading this was really liberating for me because I never see anyone willing to acknowledge these problems. Constantly I am told that "misandry doesn't exist" or that "sexism against men is impossible" because of our supposed "privilege." Thanks for making sense.

    ReplyDelete
  7. "not all women are like that and it's unfair to generalize"...yet, "no one seems to be shy about generalizing men or masculinity"... Yep, no one likes to be generalized about and yet, everybody does it (and it didn't start with feminism). MRAs' anger is justified, and what's funny is that it isn't anything that women, feminist or not, haven't felt and expressed towards men at some point in their lives (maybe even incessantly). Those of us who care need to stand in the face of this anger and really listen, and to feel the sting of truth in what the MRM is saying, and without flinching, to accept our complicity in the violation of men's rights, as well as the perpetuation of gender-based generalizations. Sure, the anger is initially kind of jarring, but I guess that's necessary to wake people up.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Thank you so much for your great articles and time and effort. I wish that people like yourself will one day be able to change the sick man hating society within which we live. Thank you ! Daniel from France.

    ReplyDelete
  9. These contain 100% active ingredient named Sildenafil citrate that is an approved ingredient to treat the male erectile dysfunction.
    Buy 100 Sildamax Tablets

    ReplyDelete
  10. We follow one aim to provide value of money for insomnia products with worthy information about what is the product, how it should be taken and possible dose.
    Zopiclone | Buy Zopiclone | Zopiclone Uk

    ReplyDelete




  11. Be in control of your tanning, of your sun kissed skin and enjoy the outcome of being able to enjoy the beautiful days ahead, with a method of tanning that truly works, is natural and easily able to be injected into the skin. Melanotan 2 uk provides those effects for anyone out there that wants to stop wasting their time in the sun or in the tanning bed and grab life to the fullest.

    The best part? If you do not want to worry about having to inject the peptides, you have the option of using the nasal spray instead. This is a way that everyone out there is able to get the tanning effects they want in half the time that they normally would be able to get them.
    Melanotan 2 | Melanotan 2 uk | Buy Melanotan 2 uk

    ReplyDelete
  12. When the time comes to find out what Kamagra can do for you, you have to evaluate your unique situation and then determine if this is the best route of action for you to take in the end when you want to fix your problem.

    If you’re suffering from a disease that is keeping you down and out about yourself, then yes Kamagra can help you with not only the problem but with your self esteem, as well! When ED problems start to arise, many men feel like they lose themselves because this is a part of who they are and this is not something that should be happening to them in the end. This is understandable, and you’re not alone. Through the use of Kamagra, so many men were able to find themselves once again and be able to make love, have some fun and let loose without having to worry about the problem showing up again when the time came to perform.

    Through the use of Kamagra, many men found that they also excelled not only in the bedroom, but in their everyday lives. They could stop worrying about this or that, they could fully enjoy everything that came from being alive and having the most fun when the time came. Buy Kamagra is what all the men out there are talking about, what they are providing you with and what you can ensure to get from them without having to worry about anything else.
    Kamagra | Buy Kamagra UK | Cheap Kamagra UK

    ReplyDelete
  13. Testimony On How My Life was Transform through the help of a God-sent Lender.

    Hello everyone, I am Kathie Roper by name, am writing this Testimony because am really grateful for what Mason Diego did for me and my family, when I thought there was no hope he came and make my family feel alive again by lending us loan at a very low interest rate of 2%. Well I have been searching for a loan to settle my debts for the past three months all I met scammed and took my money until I finally met a God sent Lender. I never thought that there are still genuine loan lenders on the internet but to my greatest surprise i got my loan without wasting much time so if you are out there looking for a loan of any amount i would advise you to email Mr Diego via email: { diegoloancompany@yahoo.com } and be free of internet scams. thanks... Kathie Roper from California, USA.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Soma 350mg is the best pill to get muscle relaxation.Buy Soma Online at low price

    ReplyDelete
  15. thanks for sharing this blog with us. Kamagra 100mg Oral Jelly is a prescription medicine used to treat erectile dysfunction (impotence) in men. This helps men to get or maintain an erection. Kamagra 100mg oral jelly buy online at the best price from a trusted pharmacy.

    ReplyDelete

Commenting policy:

All comments are welcome here. I refuse to censor points of view that differ from my own.

I recognize that I may be challenging the deep-seated beliefs of some people, and perhaps stirring up emotions in others. However, I would ask:

- if you care to respond to anything that I have said, please do not simply link to or quote some statistic. Do not simply regurgitate things you have been told are true. Think about what I am saying. Respond with an argument. Offer something from your personal observations, and explain to me how you feel your statistic is connected to your experience.

- If you wish to be part of a discussion, try not to dismiss what I or a another commenter says out of hand. Yes, that means that some lines of thought or ideologies may not stand up to scrutiny (perhaps even my own).

- Remember, ad hominem attacks diminish everyone involved. If you want to criticize anything, do so passionately and directly - but debate is about attacking ideas, not people.

Have at you!